The Ostroy Report

The Ostroy Report is a fresh, aggressive voice for Democrats and a watchdog of the GOP/Tea Party. We support President Obama and the Democratic agenda and seek to preserve the Senate majority while taking back the House. But we're also not afraid to criticize the left when necessary.

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Conservatives Arrogantly Predict Democrats' Demise Despite More Republicans Retiring


The Republican spin-machine has been operating in overdrive his week. If you listen to GOP Chairman Michael Steele, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and other leading conservative voices, 2010's midterm election is shaping up to be a veritable bloodbath for the nascent Democratic majorities in both the U.S. House of Representatives, where Dems hold a 256-178 lead, and in the Senate, where the left currently holds its first 60-seat filibuster-proof majority in decades. And the reason for the right's euphoria? A slew of critical resignations by Democratic incumbents, including those announced this week from Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, and North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan. But what these Republican propagandists won't tell you is that in the Republican vs. Democrat retirement-score in the House and Senate, their party leads 14-11 and 6-4 respectively. There are also more Republican governors choosing not to seek re-election, and in the pivotal state of Florida, party chairman Jim Greer announced he's leaving amid a hotly contested Senate primary involving Gov. Charlie Christ and Marco Rubio. But the right's chest-beating continues unabated despite the party's mounting problems.

"The successes in Virginia and New Jersey combined with the last month of Democrat withdrawals, retirements, and switches, show that the Republican Party is solidly gaining momentum and is going strong into 2010," Steele's been crowing all week. "Whether these Democrats want to admit it or not, President Obama's government-run liberal agenda and their foolish decision to wholeheartedly embrace it has increased Republicans chances of regaining the majority..."

But Steele and his pied-propagandists are privately more likely concerned about the GOP's vulnerability in several key states where its incumbents are retiring: Florida's George LeMieux, Missouri's Kit Bond, Ohio's George Voinovich, New Hampshire's Judd Gregg, and Kentucky's Jim Bunning. The problems don't end there. Over in North Carolina, polls show that first-term Sen. Richard Burr is running below 50% against unknown Democratic opponents. That state has increasingly shifted to the left, with Democrats picking up two House seats, Kay Hagen's '08landslide defeat of GOP Sen. Elizabeth Dole, and President Obama's electoral vote victory.

And while right-wingers like to point out the growing rift between liberals and blue-dog Democrats, there's an even bigger schism within the Republican Party between the hardcore "tea party" conservatives and the more moderate wing. This civil war threatens to undermine the GOP's real hopes for regaining power later this year, as evidenced by last November's special election in New York's 23rd Congressional District where tea-baggers and party leaders forced out moderate Dede Scozzafava in favor of hardliner Doug Hoffman, who lost to Democrat Bill Owens, giving the left its first victory in this solidly Republican district in over 100 years. As a matter of fact, in practically every special election last year Democrats were victorious. That should be of more concern to Steele & Company than who's retiring on the left. (Note: Dodd's retirement is actually a big plus for the party, as longstanding and very popular Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal should be able to retain the seat being vacated by the embattled and controversial five-term Senator).

The truth is, politicians on both sides of the aisle appear to be fed up with the ever-increasingly contentious, highly partisan climate in Washington. That they're throwing in the towel and looking forward to calmer pastures is of no surprise. And maybe all this excitement about retiring politicians could stoke serious discussion of term-limits. Perhaps it's not such a bad thing that worn out old codgers like Dodd, Dorgan and Voinovich move aside to allow some fresh blood to flow through the Beltway.


On another note, we could use your help at The The Adrienne Shelly Foundation. We're a 501 c 3 tax-exempt, non-profit organization dedicated in my late wife's honor, and with a simple mission: supporting women filmmakers. Adrienne, who wrote, directed and starred in the hit film WAITRESS, was killed November 1, 2006. Through the Foundation, her commitment to filmmaking lives on. We've established scholarships, grants, finishing funds, screenwriting fellowships and living stipends at NYU's Tisch School of the Arts/Kanbar Institute of Film; Columbia University; American Film Institute; Women in Film; IFP; the Nantucket Film Festival; the Tribeca Film Institute; and the Sundance Institute. Your generous contribution will go a long way towards helping us achieve this very important mission. Please click here to make a donation. Thank you.

4 Comments:

  • At 4:13 PM, Blogger Dicky Neely said…

    Term limits is no panacea for our okitical morass. Term limits, are at their core, unconstitutional and assume the voting public is too stupid to pick good elected officials. Term limits brought us Fred Thompson to replace Jim Sasser as just one example.

     
  • At 6:56 PM, Anonymous Realist said…

    We in California have had term limits for years now. Why would any other state want to become grid locked like we are?

    As for the Republican arrogance regarding the coming reduction in elected Democrats, they are being excessive. They have nothing but emotional manipulation to promote to the Tea Baggers whose brains are swamped with the biochemicals of emotionalism.

    But that doesn't mean that the Democrats have nothing to fear. I just left a Chicago Tribune comment thread in which no one stood up for the pending passage of the Senate's abomination of health care reform, instead blasting Obama and the Democrats over the "Cadillac" tax.

    As someone who is going to be affected by this new tax, I understand their outrage. I share it. But I will not vote for Republicans over Democrats. In that I differ with those who will. I will either find a third-party candidate to vote for, or enter "None of the Above" on my ballot.

    The point is that Obama and the Democrats are playing with electoral dynamite. We may see the first explosion over the growing scandal involving Tim Geithner, but it isn't going to stop there. As more people become afflicted with what is deemed "reform", they will be more likely to listen to the blather that the GOP is famous for generating. Two years of Democratic inaction in meeting the needs of the people will be held against the Democrats, and the people will agree.

    So even though the GOP are acting like high-school morons over the pending retirements of Democrats while ignoring those of their own party also leaving the game, that doesn't mean that they won't win it anyway.

     
  • At 7:16 PM, Blogger Barry Schwartz said…

    I lost interest in the rest of the posting when I came upon the mention of "term limits".

     
  • At 9:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    We have term limits in Michigan and it is a mess. With all the turnovers the lobbists run the show. It will be impossible to get rid of it since many voters do not realize the problems it has caused.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home